El domingo, 29 de abril de 2018 15:51:44 -03 Dmitry Shachnev escribió: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 06:20:02PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Note they are not the same: even excluding the commercial part (i.e. > > the first half in both) > > - GPL-3-Qt is GPL-3+ or as approved by KDE Free Qt > > - GPL-3-Qt-v2 is GPL-3 "with exceptions" > > <nitpick> > Per the copyright spec, it is better to use “with … exception” syntax for > specifying exceptions, so it would be “GPL-3 with Qt-1.0 exception”. > > This is what we are doing in the other Qt modules. > </nitpick>
I actually agree on both comments. And ideally we should have a reference somewhere for it, as it applies to most of the packages in qt/* ¿Any ideas on what would be a good approach for this? I personally think crafting an examples page in www, maybe plain text for easier C&P? -- "No es el crecimiento de la tecnología lo que excluye, sino la protección sistemática de los derechos de uso de la misma, lo cual se puede aplicar al arte." David Cuartielles Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
