Hi, meanwhile 0.22.0 is available within testing and Debhelper 14 is released too. So we can start migrating to Debhelper 14 ;)
> Yes, apologies, I was not clear enough. It has nothing to do with qml > itself. `qt6-dev` would be a metapackage to install **all** the `-dev` > packages related to Qt. The problem with this is that, without a lintian > rule, this can be used as a build-dependency for packages... which will > bloat the builds. > > Not long before leaving maintainership I learnt that it would be possible > to add a fatal-like lintian rule to avoid qt6-dev being used in > Build-Dependencies. In fact, there is the possibility that some package > already does so. This would enable having this much wanted metapackage > (users tend to like having this option). Thanks for this longer repose. Such a fatal-like lintan rule would also help us on those qt6-*-dev-tools packages, that should only be treated as multiarch implementation details and should not be used in a dependency. Regards, hefee
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
