On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:20:20PM +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > That leaves plasma-only thingies. > Should they be called plasma-$NAME, $NAME-plasma, $NAME-plasma-$TYPE, $NAME, > plasma-$TYPE-$NAME or something completely different. > for $TYPE, there is dataengine, containment, applet and a few others. > I guess my suggestion would be plasma-$NAME. > If a source package contains a application and something uses plasma, they > should in general be in same package, but if that is not desired, the plasma > part can be split out in plasma-$NAME
We've been using plasmoid-foo in Kubuntu, which seems a nicer fit since that is what plasma applets are called by upstream. Jonathan -- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk