At Sunday 16 November 2008 19:56, you wrote:
> On Sunday 16 November 2008 20:46:01 you wrote:
> > At Sunday 16 November 2008 19:39, you wrote:
> > > On Sunday 16 November 2008 20:29:54 you wrote:
> > > > At Sunday 16 November 2008 19:19, you wrote:
> > > > > since the current KHTML layout engine(konqueror 4.x.x) is much better
> > > > > than the one in debian lenny(konqueror 3.5.9) could you update the
> > > > > older konqueror in order to use this engine in order for the users to
> > > > > have a better web page behaviour..
> > > >
> > > > How did you reach the conclusion that it is better?
> > > >
> > > > Toma
> > >
> > > WOW! thanks for the quick reply...
> > > anyway. better in terms of compatibility with webpages. for example..
> > > http://www.tvsubtitles.net/
> > > look the tabs in that page( i know, that it's the page fault, but i
> > > believe that konqueror 4 renders it better)
> > You believe? So from knowing it for certain in your first message, you are
> > now guessing, right?
> > Toma
> yes i am guessing
> i remember running a virtual kde 4 and konqueror 4 scored 75(if i remember
> right) on the acid3 test. based on this, i believe that the engine is better.
> of course you know better than me. But could explain to me why we shouldnt
> the latest KHML engine? i would surely understand. :)
I don't know better. I was just wondering how you reached the conclusion... I
would guess that konq 4.1.3 is much less mature than the engine from 3.5.9,
because of the usage of new technology.
Anyway, the 4 series can not be mixed, as pino already mentioned, so it is not