On Monday 28 October 2013 09:38:21 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Monday 28 October 2013 10:47:13 Vishesh Handa wrote: > > Hey everyone > > > > The patch applies perfectly (in the 2.9 branch). However, my cmake foo > > is not the great, so it would be nice if some else could also take a > > look at it. > > Great :) > > > @Lisandro: I assume you'll want a new release of Soprano to be made? > > 2.9.5? Soprano 2.10 is not going to be released, we're going to jump > > to version 3.0 after this which will break binary compatibility since > > we will be moving to Qt5. > > Sune Vuorela told me that there might be soprano upstream devs that might be > using our packaged virtuoso. If we switch virtuoso+soprano to m-a paths, > their dev builds of soprano will stop working. > > So if the patch gets accepted upstream and you find it ok, we can simply > patch our current soprano (2.9.3 iirc) and upstream devs will get it the > necessary changes via soprano's repo.
OK, due to various reasons we need to move forward, so we will apply the patch. If you can make a 2.9.5 release, the better :-) Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
