On Thursday 09 January 2014 14:24:37 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I've started packaging the KF5 Technical Preview for Kubuntu and I'd really > like the packages to be able to be picked up by Debian. > > I'm putting them into our experimental PPA. > > https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-ppa/+archive/experimental/+packages > > Please take a look and let me know of any changes needed.
I really don't know if I'll be able to make the time to look at them, but: > some questions: > do -dbg packages get a library version? libfoo5-dbg or libfoo-dbg (or is > Debian getting automatically made dbgsym any time soon?) At first thought I think I would use libfoo5-dbg, but I remember that ¿Pino? told me some rationale behind preferring libfoo-dbg that made me do the switch in libqjson. I think it was similar to the -dev one, but I can't tell it for sure. >debian/copyright > Source point to git archive or > https://projects.kde.org/projects/frameworks/kcodecs The last one. > use multi-arch: same? If it's applicable, I don't see why not. > attica has same source package in qt4 version, renamed to attica-kf5 but > is kf5attica better? (alternativly they could both be built out of the same > source as I've done with phonon but that gets complex quickly). If I would be looking for attica I would expect the source name to start with attica. So I would prefer attica-kf5 as source name. And I think I'll go with phonon-qt5 for source name instead of mangling the rules files that much. If the source has a bug, I prefer to push two sources than needing to mangle error-prone rules files. Thanks a lot for your effort! -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.