Hi Sandro, On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:28:20PM +0200, Sandro Knauß wrote: > Hey, > > after days I spent inside the copyright file. I think now QtWebEngine is now > ready for upload. Could somebody please review the package? > If it helps I can also upload one built to mentors, because it takes ~2h on > my > machine.
Please rename the binary packages for consistency with other Qt modules:
* libqt5webengine-dev → qtwebengine5-dev (cf. qtbase5-dev)
* qt5webengine-examples → qtwebengine5-examples (cf. qtbase5-examples)
* qt5webengine-doc{,-html} → qtwebengine5-doc{,-html} (cf. qtbase5-doc)
Which script did you use for generating debian/copyright?
It would be nice to get that documented in debian/README.Debian
(with instructions on how to update that file for newer releases).
There are also some weird entries there, like:
Files: src/3rdparty/chromium/third_party/skia/*
Copyright: 2008-2016, Google Inc
2015, Google Inc.
2015, Google Inc." "
2013-2015, Google, Inc
[...]
block
block suitable for this language, with the
License: BSD-3-clause
In any case, the FTP masters will do a more thorough review of copyright
file than me :)
> I packaged the 5.7.1 snapshot, that is built against Qt 5.6.1 (sid)
> successfully, should it uploaded to experimental or testing? Tighen dependency
> to one specific Qt version?
It would be nice to depend on 5.7.1~20161021 versions of Qt (again like we
do in all the other modules). However qtwebchannel 5.7 is not yet available,
and qtdeclarative is only available on amd64/i386 at the moment, so I do not
insist on this.
--
Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-kde-talk
