Source: ldiskfsprogs
Version: 1.41.90.wc4+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20130129 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in wheezy on amd64

Hi,

During a rebuild of all packages in *wheezy*, your package failed to
build on amd64.

Relevant part:
> ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
> │ Install ldiskfsprogs build dependencies (apt-based resolver)                
>  │
> └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
> 
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Reading state information...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  sbuild-build-depends-ldiskfsprogs-dummy : Depends: lustre-dev but it is not 
> installable
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.

The full build log is available from:
   
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2013/01/29/ldiskfsprogs_1.41.90.wc4+dfsg-1_wheezy.log

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.

_______________________________________________
Pkg-lustre-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-lustre-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-lustre-maintainers

Reply via email to