On Do, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:36:31 (CET), Alessio Treglia wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Petr Salinger <petr.salin...@seznam.cz> 
> wrote:
>> I propose
>> package snd-gtk-pulse everywhere, on linux uses ALSA, on GNU/kFreeBSD OSS
>> package snd-gtk-jack on i386 amd64 powerpc CPUs, i.e. also on kfreebsd-amd64
>> and kfreebsd-i386
>> package snd-nox everywhere, on linux uses ALSA, on GNU/kFreeBSD OSS
> Agreed.
> Do we really need to change the name? Could we simply leave
> snd-nox-alsa unchanged and build it with different configurations on
> Linux and kFreeBSD?

if that means to make the snd-nox-alsa package to use oss on kFreeBSD,
then I'd object to that idea. That would cause too much confusion IMO.

Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to