Am 18.03.2010 15:35, schrieb Reinhard Tartler:
If you care to comment on this issue, please participate in the vote, so
that we can assemble a report for the release team quickly.


I am indifferent between A and B, just because I am lacking knowledge about jack internals. But either of both is IMHO better than maintaining both packages, which will require a lot of new infrastructure and redundant work and further discussion only slows things down even more. So my vote is:

(A<>B)>C>F

My vote should not be decisive for the choice between jack1 and jack2.

--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath

Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum

Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax:     +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail:  greffr...@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to