Hi Andrian, |--==> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:17:59 +0100, Adrian Knoth <a...@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> said:
AK> Why 1.9.4+something and not 1.9.5? Sorry, I meant 1.9.5-1. AK> I'd like to sort out the config file issue (dpkg vs. ucf), but we could AK> probably upload d2c23abd119cdf7f40654fa443e2a51cf6265893, that is, AK> before I touched the (re-)generation of audio.conf AK> We currently only have one version of this file shipped to the user, so AK> we're talking about one MD5 sum and a second one for our new version if AK> we lower the rt-priority from 99 to 95. This seems a good idea to me, AK> because there's no need for highest rt prios, they should be left to AK> watchdogs which will kill rt processes if they hook up all cpu time. AK> Though modern kernels never grant all cpu time to rt kernels anymore, AK> it's just not necessary to run audio stuff at rtprio 95. jackd usually AK> runs at 10. That sounds good to me. Once all the rough edges are polished I think it's good to upload jack2 to unstable so we can get more testing and feedback. Ciao! Free _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
