On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > Am 15.06.2010 12:30, schrieb Thibaut VARENE: >> >> Could you consider, as a mitigation between two extreme options, that >> in the event upstream fails to fix this bug in a timely fashion, >> whenever you upload a new version of libflac you'd include this patch >> with it? It can easily be reverted to whatever upstream finds sensible >> afterwards, and will at least ensure that newer versions of libflac >> aren't plagued with this bug. Since Debian is unaffected per se, the >> sourceful rebuild of affected packages is not necessarily mandatory, >> but there again, it would ensure that newer packages aren't affected >> anymore... Does that make sense? > > Yes, this sounds reasonable. With "this patch" do you mean the one I already > posted to this bug report or do you have another (maybe less invasive) one > at hand?
The one you posted, since it's known to work fine ;-) Thanks -- Thibaut VARENE http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/ _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers