On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Arnout Engelen <arnou...@bzzt.net> wrote: > Hmm, in this case it seems elegant to stick to Darcs, as upstream doesn't do > releases and this way we can leave generating the .orig.tar.gz to > darcs-buildpackage (http://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithDarcs).
I'm not confident with Darcs and, at the moment, I don't have so much time and patience to learn one more VCS. Sorry. > On the other hand it makes sense to have debian-multimedia packages in a > consistent format, so perhaps it'd be best to maintain this package outside of > debian-multimedia? What do you think? IMHO quality increases as well as the number of people working on, so playing in a team is always the best choice. Anyway, we could use both: - git to store the packaging - darcs to retrieve the original tarball, for example by putting a get-orig-source target in debian/rules WDYT? -- Alessio Treglia <ales...@alessiotreglia.com> Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com 0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0 _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers