On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Arnout Engelen <arnou...@bzzt.net> wrote:
> Hmm, in this case it seems elegant to stick to Darcs, as upstream doesn't do
> releases and this way we can leave generating the .orig.tar.gz to
> darcs-buildpackage (http://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithDarcs).

I'm not confident with Darcs and, at the moment, I don't have so much
time and patience to learn one more VCS.
Sorry.

> On the other hand it makes sense to have debian-multimedia packages in a
> consistent format, so perhaps it'd be best to maintain this package outside of
> debian-multimedia? What do you think?

IMHO quality increases as well as the number of people working on, so
playing in a team is always the best choice.

Anyway, we could use both:

 - git to store the packaging
 - darcs to retrieve the original tarball, for example by putting a
get-orig-source target in debian/rules

WDYT?

-- 
Alessio Treglia <ales...@alessiotreglia.com>
Debian & Ubuntu Developer | Homepage: http://www.alessiotreglia.com
0FEC 59A5 E18E E04F 6D40 593B 45D4 8C7C DCFC 3FD0

_______________________________________________
pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list
pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers

Reply via email to