On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:55:15AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:06 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

On 2010-09-12 19:27, Alessio Treglia wrote:
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote:
I noticed that you left debian/docs. Do you think that might conflict
with the README.txt in debian/links?


Excellent!  I'll remove the override_dh_strip targets.  Is this a
product of using dh_auto_install instead of make?

No, it isn't. The Makefile contains all that, dh_auto_install just
runs 'make install'.

sorry to interrupt, but as i see it, the build process now
unconditionally strips the binaries, which violates the debian-policy
(4.9.1 DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS "nostrip")

at least, if i compile with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip", the resulting
binary "arraysize.pd_linux" will still be stripped.

That seems like something that debhelper should handle. Does it need a separate install-strip Makefile target?

debhelper optionally strips. It cannot "un-strip" if stripped by upstream build routines, as seems to be the case here.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to