On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:55:15AM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:06 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:On 2010-09-12 19:27, Alessio Treglia wrote:On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> wrote:I noticed that you left debian/docs. Do you think that might conflictwith the README.txt in debian/links?Fixed: http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-arraysize.git;a=commitdiff;h=7a67Excellent! I'll remove the override_dh_strip targets. Is this a product of using dh_auto_install instead of make?No, it isn't. The Makefile contains all that, dh_auto_install just runs 'make install'.sorry to interrupt, but as i see it, the build process now unconditionally strips the binaries, which violates the debian-policy (4.9.1 DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS "nostrip") at least, if i compile with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nostrip", the resulting binary "arraysize.pd_linux" will still be stripped.That seems like something that debhelper should handle. Does it need a separate install-strip Makefile target?
debhelper optionally strips. It cannot "un-strip" if stripped by upstream build routines, as seems to be the case here.
- Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
