Vincent Bernat <ber...@debian.org> writes: > listener. Moreover, this is not 100% reliable.
I was afraid there might be further complications with unoconv/OO.o, hence my suggestion to split the package (which would, however, require another pass through NEW. :-/) Another possibility might be to use ooo2dbk in conjunction with docbook-utils, dblatex, or the like. > Maybe this is is better to keep the documentation in sxw format? Perhaps, though I'd suggest trying to keep the PDF if feasible. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?...@monk.mit.edu _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers