On Thursday 11 November 2010 19:05:51 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Anyone know the story behind the 'lame' package in the NEW queue? will > it get included? did the patent stuff change? I'd like to package some > stuff that depends on it.
I haven't heard anything new related to lame. There's only the issue with inconsistency as far as what license terms lame is distributed under. All sources have standard LGPL header. A file named 'LICENSE' says lame is under LGPL. There is, however, a README file that includes 2 extra terms on top of the LGPL. Other than that, packages in the NEW queue are getting low priority anyway because of work underway to deliver a new release of Debian. -- Regards, Andres Mejia _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers