On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:41:03PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 16:00, Alessio Treglia <ales...@debian.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:33 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoel...@iem.at> wrote:
and according to what i found in the internet [1] one should indeed use both together...

Mmhh... My experience with DH 7 and dh-autoreconf says different, one must not use both dh_autoreconf and dh_autotools_dev, but only one. But we are using CDBS and I don't know how it should behave (Jonas, help us! Help us! :)).

I'm not Jonas, but I'm pitching in anyway :p. dh_autotools_dev is not what cdbs uses, so its conflict with dh_autoreconf is not relevant. Also, last time I checked ubuntu's CDBS is different from debian's, so some inconsistencies may be found there.

I tend to think this is a bug in autotools.mk not supporting calling the autotools chain.

Feel free to file bugreports against CDBS. I seems above, however, that Alessio was talking about experiences with short-form dh7, not CDBS.

 - Jonas

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list

Reply via email to