On 11-05-06 at 04:55pm, Andres Mejia wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > On 11-05-06 at 04:31pm, Andres Mejia wrote: > >> + "This library is free software; you can redistribute it > >> and/or\n" > >> + "modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public\n" > >> + "License as published by the Free Software Foundation; > >> either\n" > >> + "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later > >> version.\n" > >> "\n" > > > > There is no such thing as version 2 of the "GNU Lesser General > > Public License". > > > > There is either "GNU Library General Public License" version 2.0 or > > "GNU Lesser General Public License" version 2.1. > > > > The former is considered obsolete by the Free Software Foundation, > > and the latter is by the Free Software Foundation interpreted as a > > successor to the older _Library_ license even if differently named.
> The copyright headers for the sources in LAME still say LGPL2.0. The > patch simply reflects this. I suspect you do not understand my point, then: LGPL2.0 == GNU Library General Public License version 2.0 LGPL2.0 != GNU Lesser General Public License version 2 You proposed the latter, which has 2 (two) flaws: a) "Lesser" instead of the correct "Library", and b) "2" instead of the correct "2.0". Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers