On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 14:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 22:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 19:30 +0000, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:45, Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 17:41 -0300, "Felipe Sateler" <fsate...@debian.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 21:55, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 19:08, Felipe Sateler <fsate...@debian.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:37, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>>>>>>> <h...@at.or.at> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:37 -0800, "Hans-Christoph Steiner" >>>>>>>>> <h...@at.or.at> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Dec 24, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 21:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner >>>>>>>>>>> <h...@at.or.at> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just ITPed, packaged and uploaded pd-hid to git.debian.org. It >>>>>>>>>>>> is an >>>>>>>>>>>> object for Pure Data that allows you to use USB HID devices in >>>>>>>>>>>> Pd. >>>>>>>>>>>> The >>>>>>>>>>>> build system is similar in structure to pd-plugin and >>>>>>>>>>>> pd-freeverb, >>>>>>>>>>>> plus >>>>>>>>>>>> it includes the kFreeBSD and Hurd updates, so it should build on >>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>> platforms. It depends on pd-mapping and recommends pd-pddp, >>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>> are >>>>>>>>>>>> both in NEW. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-hid.git;a=summary >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There is some code that is not yours, please add Jan Truetzschler >>>>>>>>>>> Falkenstein to the debian/copyright file (ftpmaster may reject >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> package for this missing information). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for spotting that, I pushed the fix. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Ping. Anyone willing to sponsor this one? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, I lost track of this. I will try to get to this (and your >>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>> packages) during the weekend. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I clearly didn't do this when promised, and this week I couldn't >>>>>>> either. I've been extremely busy. I'm sorry about that. If someone >>>>>>> else can look into these packages, please upload them, since I'm not >>>>>>> likely to get any debian time anytime soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will, if nobody else gets to these packages, still review them as >>>>>>> time permits. >>>>> >>>>> It seems that this package never got uploaded. It needs its git-dch >>>>> done and the changelog finalized and then uploaded. I can finalize the >>>>> changelog if that makes it easier. It seems some people want to do it >>>>> themselves when uploading. >>>> >>>> I believe this package needs to be fixed for puredata >= 0.43 >>> >>> As far as I can tell it has already. For me, it builds on >>> Debian/testing using puredata-dev and no puredata, and squeeze using >>> puredata 0.42.6. >> >> Indeed, it seems to work. >> >> I have a licensing question though. The package is distributed as >> GPLv3+. However, Supercollider (where some code was borrowed) is >> GPLv2+. I think debian/copyright should document that fact. Code from >> 2004 cannot possibly be under GPLv3+ unless relicensed. > > The GPLv2+ license has that built into it. In the context of this project, > the code from SuperCollider is so intermingled, there is no easily > recognizable chunk that could be labeled GPLv2+. Since the project is > GPLv3+, I think it would be misleading to try to say that a file is > available under GPLv2+. If people want the GPLv2+ file, they should go to > the original SuperCollider source. > > Here's the text from the GPL: > > "Each version is given a distinguishing version number. If the Program > specifies that a certain numbered version of the GNU General Public License > "or any later version" applies to it, you have the option of following the > terms and conditions either of that numbered version or of any later version > published by the Free Software Foundation. "
Indeed, I'm not questioning that. My point is that the objective of debian/copyright is documenting, not relicensing, even if it is permissible. -- Saludos, Felipe Sateler _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers