On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Fabian Greffrath <fab...@greffrath.com> wrote: > Am 01.02.2012 16:02, schrieb Reinhard Tartler: > >> Sorry, I disagree with that approach. It a) increases the complexity >> of the packaging considerably, b) doubles the build-times and c) >> doesn't help at all with keeping the diff for ubuntu minimal. > > > Well, I think that's debatable. Having two separate source package for the > sake of two additional codecs could also be considered as increased > complexity.
It's the status quo. And I don't believe that the implementation of what you guys propose will be any less complex than what we currently have. > And if I understand it right, it's only libavcodec that needs to > get rebuilt with a slightly different set of confflags, i.e. the ones that > enable the codecs in question. These could be set to different values (i.e. > different additional codecs) depending if the package is built for Debian or > Ubuntu. The proposal doesn't allow me to drop libav-extra in Ubuntu. This means, that 'libav' in Ubuntu/main must not provide libavcodec-extra-53. And now things start to become way to complex for me to think further about it. Sorry, but no thanks. -- regards, Reinhard _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
