Am 20.09.2012 12:03, schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
Could you suggest a better wording please? How to express better why we're not shipping from main repository and why we're asking for user's discression to build the package?
We shouldn't even attempt to touch legal ground. Just tell the users where they can find more information, e.g. <http://www.videolan.org/developers/libdvdcss.html>, and that they are using it at their own risk.
If you meant changelog of libdvdcss as a whole (not the version part) I can explain. Historically I forked libdvdcss from deb-multimedia and incorporated it before I've noticed that libdvdcss2 was also packaged here.
Yes, I meant the changelog as a whole.
Could you be more specific please? Do you mean to embed guest package changelog to host package NEWS or to use NEWS to articulate the fact that we're building package on client side?
No, the actual libdvdcss package (is that what you refer to as guest package?) should have dh_installchangelogs install NEWS instead of Changelog.
But the patch is there, properly annotated. I'm afraid I don't quite follow you again.
I am talking about this one: <http://svn.videolan.org/comp.php?repname=libdvdcss&compare[]=%2F@254&compare[]=%2F@255> - Fabian _______________________________________________ pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-multimedia-maintainers
