On Jan 29, 2008 11:28 AM, Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd say it's not that important and you can leave it as is, everyone can > do something wrong/not the optimal way. :) One way to fix it would be to > rewrite the branch on alioth, which would be evil for people tracking > your repository (one can do that with git-filter-branch, which I used to > rewrite the [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses of the git-svn-imported tree into Foo > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; but that's rewriting, and that's evil on published > branches).
Ok, I would prefer to leave it rather than rewrite the repository and if its not bothering anyone too much then this is probably the best thing to do. > > > Whilst i am writing an email. I was going to ask about the way to move > > forward with openjpeg. I don't mean to sound pushy but would just like > > to check etiquette. Should I go back to mentors with the updated > > version and issue a fresh RFS (and I suspect copy this list too) and > > just see what happens or should i just wait and someone here will move > > things when they have the free time? > > I don't think we ever discussed this, I guess that you could call for an > RFS here, and once there's no more comment (or if there's none at all), > just go find your favourite sponsor, or mentors. > > I can have a look within the next day, but I won't be able to sponsor > you in the end. Ok thanks, if you can provide any feedback this should hopefully reduce the time spent finding a sponsor etc by having a better quality package to start with. Then as suggusted I will start with a RFS on this list. Many thanks Robin _______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
