Cc'ing pkg-phototools… Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/07/2008): > On Sun 27-Jul-2008 at 06:33 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > If we have to stick with plan 1, we'll provide enblend 3.1 and > > probably hugin 0.7 (once it's released) through backports.org, which > > should be a not-so-bad solution for people that would need full > > features. > > Ok, if you are going to combine hugin-0.7.0 and enblend-3.0 I > suggest that you ship a dummy 'enfuse' with this enblend.deb that > looks something like this: > > #!/bin/sh > echo "Error, you need at least enblend-3.1 for exposure blending" > /bin/false
… since Sebastian might include that in a further upload of 3.0, which should be granted a freeze exception since it's mostly documentation (I'm thinking of such a script with a pointer to a file documenting the situation). > > - I've added enblend to the dependencies of the hugin package, which > > contains hugin, hugin_stitch_project, and nona_gui. I think it's > > the right place, but maybe it's also needed for one (or several) > > of the binaries that are available in the hugin-tools package > > (that is: all the other binaries)? > > none of the binaries call enblend directly, but if you are stitching > using the Makefile system on the command-line then you would need > nona, make, exiftool and enblend (and enfuse if you are 'exposure > blending'). Looks like I've got to learn more about that Makefile system, then. At least someone having installed “hugin” (hugin-gui) should be safe. > So the hugin GUI definitely requires enblend, the 'normal' use of the > command-line tools would usually involve enblend, but it is quite > possible that there is a valid use of the hugin command-line tools > that doesn't involve enblend. > > > - Same question for make, and exiftool. > > hugin-gui requires: hugin-tools, enblend, make, exiftool OK, I got this right at least. > hugin-tools suggests: enblend, make, exiftool That, not yet, but since I believe most users will install “hugin”, which pulls “hugin-tools”, they should be safe anyway. I'll fix this when possible. Thanks for your answers. > Done, sorry we haven't integrated them into the install target yet. No problem, I still had my tiny loop around, and I kept it in our Makefile. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
