Hi, On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 06:34:56AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Cc'ing pkg-phototools???
FYI, I'm now subscribed to hugin-ptx as well... ;-) > Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (28/07/2008): > > On Sun 27-Jul-2008 at 06:33 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > If we have to stick with plan 1, we'll provide enblend 3.1 and > > > probably hugin 0.7 (once it's released) through backports.org, which > > > should be a not-so-bad solution for people that would need full > > > features. > > > > Ok, if you are going to combine hugin-0.7.0 and enblend-3.0 I > > suggest that you ship a dummy 'enfuse' with this enblend.deb that > > looks something like this: > > > > #!/bin/sh > > echo "Error, you need at least enblend-3.1 for exposure blending" > > /bin/false > > ??? since Sebastian might include that in a further upload of 3.0, which > should be granted a freeze exception since it's mostly documentation > (I'm thinking of such a script with a pointer to a file documenting the > situation). Sounds good to me. I was actually already thinking about shipping a shell wrapper around enblend as well to filter out 3.1-specific command line options and printing a warning when they were used. I'm not entirely sure if that's a good thing to do though. Any comments? Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
