On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2012-05-08 Thomas Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm thinking about NMUing pfstools for the Octave transition. However,
> > looking at the PTS I see that there was no update in 2 years and that
> > the package is still using QT3 despite a QT4 upstream version being
> > available for a year:
> > http://sourceforge.net/news/?group_id=129921&id=298788
>
> > So, should I file a removal bug for pfstools?
>
> Directly going for removal (skipping the RFA stage) seems a little bit
> harsh, doesn't it?
Actually I don't think it's harsh. The package is clearly unmaintained
and already generating work for other developers (see Ana's mail in
#604368).
Anyway, I've prepared an NMU release with the latest 1.8.5 source code.
I need to look at it somewhat more (if you have an idea how to check the
packages, that would be cool).
Thanks
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
