Hi, sorry for not coming back earlier. I've replied to some people on IRC but that answer did not make it to the list so far :-/
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:41:05PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 07:53:36PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > On 2012-05-08 Thomas Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm thinking about NMUing pfstools for the Octave transition. However, > > > looking at the PTS I see that there was no update in 2 years and that > > > the package is still using QT3 despite a QT4 upstream version being > > > available for a year: > > > http://sourceforge.net/news/?group_id=129921&id=298788 > > > > > So, should I file a removal bug for pfstools? > > > > Directly going for removal (skipping the RFA stage) seems a little bit > > harsh, doesn't it? > > Actually I don't think it's harsh. The package is clearly unmaintained > and already generating work for other developers (see Ana's mail in > #604368). > > Anyway, I've prepared an NMU release with the latest 1.8.5 source code. > I need to look at it somewhat more (if you have an idea how to check the > packages, that would be cool). I was going to work on the package last weekend but then did not get to it because of other packaging work. I'm hoping to get to work on it this week. Thomas, if you could make your NMU-work available somehow, I'd be very happy to include that and finish your work. Thanks for your efforts, Sebastian -- Sebastian "tokkee" Harl +++ GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC +++ http://tokkee.org/ Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pkg-phototools-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-phototools-devel
