On 2021, മാർച്ച് 9 5:30:08 AM IST, Sean Whitton <[email protected]> wrote: > >+----------------------+ >| REJECT reasoning | >+----------------------+ > >One of our trainees noticed that many files in the project seems to be GPL-3+ >not GPL-3, and that d/c fails to mention one of the copyright holders on very >many of the files, CWI, Amsterdam.
I think there is a confusion here, none of the files have GPL license. >+----------------------+ >| Other comments | >+----------------------+ > >Looks like the rapidxml is dual-licensed, but d/copyright only mentions MIT. > >The license for the autotools files is not plain GPL-3, but GPL-3+ plus a >special exception. Though it was missing some copyright notices for libpg-query component and I have added them and reuploaded. >+----------------------+ >| N.B. | >+----------------------+ > >This review may not be exhaustive. Please check your source package >against your d/copyright and the ftpmaster REJECT-FAQ, throughly, >before uploading to NEW again. > >Thank you for your time and contribution! > >Sean > > > > >=== > >Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why >your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our >concerns. > -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
