On 2021, ഏപ്രിൽ 5 5:33:14 AM IST, Sean Whitton <[email protected]> wrote: >Hello Pirate, > >On Mon 29 Mar 2021 at 11:50PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >>>> +----------------------+ >>>> | Other comments | >>>> +----------------------+ >>>> >>>> A huge amount of uncompiled source code is installed into /usr/lib; >>>> shouldn't it be in /usr/share, and installed arch:all? >>> >>> These are used during build. Its upstream build system downloads >>> these sources during build. I have patched its build system to use >>> the sources provided as extra tarball. I had to include these files >>> in list of files in gemspec for the build to find these files. I will >>> need help from ruby team to exclude these in the binary package. >>> >>> At least right now, the default is to include all files belonging to >>> a gem in a single directory, either arch specific directory or arch >>> independent directory. I don't think we can mix directories for same >>> gem. >>> >>> Ruby team, any ideas on the best method here? If we don't add it to >>> gemspec's list of files, it won't build and if we remove the files in >>> deb, we will have a broken gemspec file. >>> >> >> Can you accept the package and file a bug with appropriate severity so >> we can tackle this later? We could not yet find a good way to solve >> this and I don't think it is worthy of a reject. > >Changing arch:any->arch:all is not an ordinary change and might require >going through NEW again, so I don't think this should be accepted in its >current state. > Okay removed these source files from the binary package and re-uploaded. This would leave the gemspec file a bit inconsistent, but I think that is a minor issue. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
