Hi! Another update. We should finish our release tasks this weekend by a big mail to debian-release.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 02:36:51PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > > The summary (information gathered from QA report, PTS, BTS): > > > > | Newer upstream available (7) > > | libdb4.2-ruby 0.6.2-3 < 0.6.5 > > | libdb4.3-ruby 0.6.2-2 < 0.6.5 > > | libdb4.4-ruby 0.6.2-1 < 0.6.5 > > > > Michael Schutte is working on it. The libdb-ruby is already on 0.6.5 in > > sid, not in testing just yet. These source pakages should be removed and > > libdb-ruby's libdbX.Y-ruby package should provide for a transition. > > Status of this work? Anyone? Done! Also the breaking reverse depends (gonzui) have been taken care of. > > | NEW and incoming (1) > > | libcairo-ruby S #487204 pending > > > > This bug, severity serious, has been fixed in 1.6.3. However, 1.5.1 > > is in Lenny. I worked for months on the new upstream. I'd really like > > to have 1.6.3 in Lenny. If we cannot get the exeception, then we have > > a 1.5.1+bugfix in the branches. > > The 1.6.3 upstream is in Sid now. A release block exception should > be requested. Ok, we decided to go with 1.5.1-1+lenny1 which contains a specific fix for this RC bug and no more. It's in testing-proposed-updates. > > | Ready for upload (1) > > | libgd-ruby I #472438 > > svn-released:pending > > > > All fixed and ready. Except it segfaults on amd64! I would appreciate some > > help here, because we need to have this version in Lenny IMO. > > Still need help here. Still need help! > > | Work in progress (2) > > | libgems-ruby #403407 wontfix > > | #485739 > > | #448639 > > | #405789 > > | #466189 > > > > All normal or wishlist bugs. Though, a few seem "important" to me, but ok. > > Two questions. > > > > 1. RubyGems 1.2.0 is not in Lenny, I think it should be? Or not? > > If so, we need an exception. > > 2. The libgems-ruby package doesn't seem to contain a 'rubygems' dummy > > package to depend on 'rubygems1.8'. Is this not a RC bug? > > More bugreports were filed, mostly related to (2). This needs to > be addressed. I am sure it is a RC bug now (grave -> #495320). These bugs do not occur in the testing version of libgems-ruby (Lenny also does not contain the reworked rubygems packages, just 1.1.1-1. There seems to be an agreement to keep it as it is, because new upstream (1.2.0, containing the reworked pkg structure) is too big a difference in upstream any. The rev. depends are currently fixed in Sid, but not broken in Lenny either before it was before the rework. > > | liblocale-ruby I? #470798 > > > > This bug should be severity "important". Antonio and I agree that the > > easiest solution would be to have it removed from Lenny and really solve > > it well for Lenny +1. Note that liblocale-ruby{,1.8} have no > > reverse depends. > > The release team should be asked to remove it for Lenny. Still needs to happen, yes. > > | libxtemplate-ruby1.8 I #472430 > > > > Gotta work on this and straighten it out. Not much work though. > > Handled by Gunnar and solved in Sid. A release block exception > should be requested. Indeed. > > > | ruby-gnome2 I #493063 > > > > A recent important bug, haven't investigated it. May be inreproducible. > > More grave/important bugs were filed! One of them is another > "objects creation during garbage collection phase" problem. > Sjoerd suggested that he has a few patches for this. These should be > applied and tested. Afterwards a release exception block should be > requested. The RC bug has been fixed in 0.17.0~rc1-4, which is in Sid. What about #493063? Paul -- PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers