Hi Paul, Paul van Tilburg wrote: >>> | Work in progress (2) >>> | libgems-ruby #403407 wontfix >>> | #485739 >>> | #448639 >>> | #405789 >>> | #466189 >>> >>> All normal or wishlist bugs. Though, a few seem "important" to me, but ok. >>> Two questions. >>> >>> 1. RubyGems 1.2.0 is not in Lenny, I think it should be? Or not? >>> If so, we need an exception.
The exception of RubyGems 1.2.0-2 in unstable has already been accepted by the release team. It will come to Lenny. >>> 2. The libgems-ruby package doesn't seem to contain a 'rubygems' dummy >>> package to depend on 'rubygems1.8'. Is this not a RC bug? >> More bugreports were filed, mostly related to (2). This needs to >> be addressed. I am sure it is a RC bug now (grave -> #495320). I have just uploaded RubyGems 1.2.0-3 which contains a dependency package (rubygems) and sent an exception request to debian-release. #495320 is not a bug. The user purged the package, which results in removing the installed gem. I have just changed the severity to wishlist. Regards, Daigo -- Daigo Moriwaki beatles at sgtpepper dot net _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers