On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 13:43, Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ I am adding a Cc: to the debian-perl list, as the PET wizards live > there and might have a say on this. Also, because the pkg-perl group > has some packages which could be moved into a packages-wip > directory, cleaning up our main stats? ]
There's also the newly created pet-devel list :) > I do think packages-wip is a good thing to have. Maybe it would be > better to "export" the idea to other groups, and add support for it in > PET, just as an extra section? I don't fully understand what you propose. What would be the logic that PET should gain? If I read correctly the packages-wip directory is used for packages that under PET are shown as WIP anyways... So getting rid of it sounds sensible to me -- Martín Ferrari _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
