Antonio Terceiro dijo [Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:25:17PM -0300]: > > pkg-ruby extras uses packages-wip for things that have started moving, > > but are still not good enough for upload. Those are... well, somehow > > out of PET's scope, IMHO (although telling us about new versions could > > be good). > > > > What pkg-ruby-extras regards as 'work in progress' is packages that, > > in their version in SVN, have an UNRELEASED distribution. > > You mean pkg-perl here, right?
Sure, sorry > > > I am willing to organize that, what do you think? > > > > I do think packages-wip is a good thing to have. Maybe it would be > > better to "export" the idea to other groups, and add support for it in > > PET, just as an extra section? > > What do you think of Martín's solution of listing never-uploaded > packages in a different section? IMHO it solves your concerns of > differentiating what we meant with packages-wip from what PET meant by > "WIP". > > (this way we could move packages from packages-wip to packages and still > have them differentiated from packages that were already uploaded and do > affect Debian's QA). +1 for all that! ;-) That's the best way out, keeping us stupid humans from interfering. -- Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244 PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23 Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
