On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > metadata.gz). And although data.tar.gz unpacks on the current > directory, I guess we could save quite a bit of animosity by handling > gems as we handle a regular orig.tar.gz.
The gem tar format also has timestamp issues on the files that cause warnings and add to being dirty. Repacking the tarball to fix this yet another step when it'd be so much better to start with a clean tarball. _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
