2010/8/5 Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>:
>> libglobalhotkeys-ruby seems more  understandable than librghk-ruby.
>
> That's a problem that you should probably address as the upstream author
> ;)

I think I will change the require call for require 'globalhotkeys' in
the next upstream release. Can I stay with libglobalhotkeys-ruby for
now ?

>> As for doc-base, the package does not install "online" documentation,
>> only the rdoc html file and a ruby example. Should I use doc-base ?
>
> Yes, I think so.

I gonna take a look at at a project that use doc-base.

-- 
Vincent Carmona

_______________________________________________
Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers

Reply via email to