On 05/08/10 at 16:26 +0200, vincent carmona wrote: > 2010/8/5 Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]>: > >> libglobalhotkeys-ruby seems more understandable than librghk-ruby. > > > > That's a problem that you should probably address as the upstream author > > ;) > > I think I will change the require call for require 'globalhotkeys' in > the next upstream release. Can I stay with libglobalhotkeys-ruby for > now ?
If you are sure that you will do it, then yes. > >> As for doc-base, the package does not install "online" documentation, > >> only the rdoc html file and a ruby example. Should I use doc-base ? > > > > Yes, I think so. > > I gonna take a look at at a project that use doc-base. Isn't it used by other pkg-ruby-extras packages? -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | _______________________________________________ Pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers
