CONCURRENCY is now a stable tested feature. Is it realistic to remove this for wheezy?
We could - Just remove the option to set it in rcS, and retain the existing fallbacks for non-insserv-enabled systems, or - Remove everything and strictly require insserv. I guess this depends upon how many systems are still out there using the fallbacks. Would it be possible to abort install in the preinst if we encounter such a system for the latter option? In git, I've gone with the safe former option, but could do the latter if that's acceptable. tmpfs Recently a number of bug reports have surfaced regarding running out of space on /tmp. I think we do an OK job with the existing /run and /run/lock defaults, but we can probably do better with /tmp. Another issue was leaving files hidden on the original /tmp. I'd like to propose: - moving mounting of /tmp from kernel to after checkroot but before mountall. - merging this with the existing overflowtmp logic, which should probably be using the same defaults - cleaning /tmp before mounting the tmpfs (using the existing bootclean logic). We just move it to before mountall. Does this sound OK? Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' schroot and sbuild http://alioth.debian.org/projects/buildd-tools `- GPG Public Key F33D 281D 470A B443 6756 147C 07B3 C8BC 4083 E800 _______________________________________________ Pkg-sysvinit-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-sysvinit-devel
