On 02/06/2016 03:20 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Jens Reyer wrote: >> you're absolutely right, I like that idea. >> >> Just, how to handle the binaries in -tools? >> atm these aren't multiarch'ed, so nothing to care about. We could even >> drop the winegcc32/64 distinction. >> But for co-installability we'd need to find a solution for wmc, wrc, >> winecpp, winegcc, wineg++, winedump, winebuild and winemaker. >> >> I suggest to worry about that later, or do you see that as a blocker? > > I say let's give up support for coinstallability of the tools, but > it's inevitable that someone will complain.
fyi, I've nearly implemented the bindir change. There was some unexpected stuff going on (more on that later). It just needs a bit more testing, and I'll commit later. _______________________________________________ pkg-wine-party mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party
