On 02/06/2016 05:28 PM, Jens Reyer wrote: > On 02/06/2016 03:20 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Jens Reyer wrote: >>> you're absolutely right, I like that idea. >>> >>> Just, how to handle the binaries in -tools? >>> atm these aren't multiarch'ed, so nothing to care about. We could even >>> drop the winegcc32/64 distinction. >>> But for co-installability we'd need to find a solution for wmc, wrc, >>> winecpp, winegcc, wineg++, winedump, winebuild and winemaker. >>> >>> I suggest to worry about that later, or do you see that as a blocker? >> >> I say let's give up support for coinstallability of the tools, but >> it's inevitable that someone will complain. > > fyi, I've nearly implemented the bindir change. There was some > unexpected stuff going on (more on that later). It just needs a bit more > testing, and I'll commit later.
Done, everything should be explained in the commit messages. I plan to add all missing manpages sometimes the next days. Greets! jre _______________________________________________ pkg-wine-party mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-wine-party
