On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:26 AM, Laércio de Sousa <[email protected]> wrote: > After investigating their current binary versions in stretch (I'm only > watching on their source versions until now, and I'm not aware about binNMUs > before), I just realized that a "+b1~bop8+1" could be a good suffix for > those jessie packages that only need to be rebuilt against backported new > libs.
No, a "~bpo8+1" suffix is still correct (it'll always be strictly less than the version in stretch). If for whatever reason you need to binNMU packages in backports, you can file binNMU bugs against the release.debian.org pseudopackage (the resulting packages will have a suffix of "~bpo8+1+b1"). About backporting xfce 4.12 as a whole...have you discussed this with the Debian xfce team yet? The initial backport may be manageable, but is maintaining these backported packages for the entire lifetime of jessie (and keeping them up-to-date with stretch) feasible? Are you willing to handle all bug reports associated with these backported packages? Regards, Vincent _______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
