Hi,
>>> Therefore, please take the time and: >>> - contact your upstream (if existing) and ask about the state of a Qt5 >>> port of your application >>> - if there are no activities regarding porting, investigate whether there >>> are >>> suitable alternatives for your users >>> - if there is a Qt5 port that is not yet packaged, consider packaging it >>> - if both the Qt4 and the Qt5 versions already coexist in the Debian >>> archives, consider removing the Qt4 version >> >> I have to admit I'm not really interested in the Qt lightdm components so I'd >> be just fine in disabling Qt4 stuff. But some packages like lightdm-kde- >> greeter and razorqt-lightdm-greeter actually use it, so I guess some >> coordination will be needed. I'm adding them to the loop. > > Thanks for keeping me in the loop. > > RazorQt it's Qt4 only, the project has merged along with LXDE as LXQt > (hopefully LXQt is or will be Qt5-ready). > > All components (incl. razorqt-lightdm-greeter) are part of the same > source package. So all of it will get removed at the same time, along > with Qt4 or before. (lightdm-kde Debian maintainer here) lightdm-kde upstream seems entirely dead for 4 years now. I won't do a port to Qt5. So I guess what I should do is ask for lightm-kde to be removed from the repository. Lisandro, can I wait with that until you really remove Qt4 or should I rather do this ASAP? Kind regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel
