On 15 September 2017 at 06:31, Ralf Jung <p...@ralfj.de> wrote: > Hi, [snip] > lightdm-kde upstream seems entirely dead for 4 years now. I won't do a > port to Qt5. So I guess what I should do is ask for lightm-kde to be > removed from the repository. Lisandro, can I wait with that until you > really remove Qt4 or should I rather do this ASAP?
First of all, thanks you all for your replies. Ideally they should get removed *before* qt4 itself, but there is no need to rush. A good moment to consider asking for their removals is whenever we set the bugs' severities to important, which won't happen soon. On the other hand, knowing that you already stated that they can be removed alongside Qt 4 itself I *will* ask for their removal citing your replies whenever we get to remove Qt4. But again, the sooner the better, as some other packages might be depending on yours (you won't believe the amount of strange things you might find out when removing packages...). Thanks! -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Pkg-xfce-devel mailing list Pkg-xfce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-xfce-devel