I compared this patch with the original C patch. There was a check in C
that does not exist in your Java patch:
1019
if(data.size() != 3){
1020
lifecycle = 0xf0;
1021
RA::Error(LL_PER_PDU, "RA_Processor::GetLifecycle", "apdu response is the
wrong size, the size is: %x", data.size());
1022
goto loser;
1023
}
Why does it not apply in Java?
Thanks,
Christina
On 11/15/2016 06:20 PM, John Magne wrote:
Ticket: TPS throws "err=6" when attempting to format and e :
https://fedorahosted.org/pki/ticket/2544
Fix tested on standard card, it does what it is supposed to do. It checks first
to make sure the lifecycle
state needs to be changed before attempting to do so. This will prevent any
cards that return an error when
one tries to over write the value with the same value it had before.
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
_______________________________________________
Pki-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pki-devel
