On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote: > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 23:04:45 Marco Martin wrote: > > these are some benchmark (probably not realy accurate) should give a > > really gross idea.. > > i measured the time elased to convert to pass 1000 icons 32x32 argb32 > > I'm interested: could you also run this benchmark for 96x96 icons, which is > often used for the icon in notification icons? Currently it also uses png's > to transfer this data, but it wouldn't surprise me if with those bigger > icons png's are faster. >
here we go: png: 8.97 8.96 8.92 8.76 9 8.86 9.03 9.07 8.77 9.19 average 8.95 raw 2.868 2.698 2.821 2.915 2.877 2.816 2.819 2.685 2.790 2.783 average 2.807 in this case the difference is so embrassing that i wonder if there is something wrong but yeah, it seems to justify using raw :p Cheers, Marco Martin > Regards, > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Plasma-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
