On Wednesday 01 April 2009 11:09:52 Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Rob Scheepmaker wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 March 2009 23:04:45 Marco Martin wrote: > > > these are some benchmark (probably not realy accurate) should give a > > > really gross idea.. > > > i measured the time elased to convert to pass 1000 icons 32x32 argb32 > > > > I'm interested: could you also run this benchmark for 96x96 icons, which > > is often used for the icon in notification icons? Currently it also uses > > png's to transfer this data, but it wouldn't surprise me if with those > > bigger icons png's are faster. > > here we go: > png: > 8.97 > 8.96 > 8.92 > 8.76 > 9 > 8.86 > 9.03 > 9.07 > 8.77 > 9.19 > average > 8.95 > > raw > 2.868 > 2.698 > 2.821 > 2.915 > 2.877 > 2.816 > 2.819 > 2.685 > 2.790 > 2.783 > average > 2.807 > > in this case the difference is so embrassing that i wonder if there is > something wrong but yeah, it seems to justify using raw :p
Ok, thanks for running this benchmark: indeed dbus seems a lot faster then I expected it to be. I'd better also move the notification's image data to raw format. _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
