> You might very well not be reading this correctly, as it's phrased very > ambiguously:
Very likely. It is just that the ambiguous wording with the conclusion didn't give me the confidence of the quality of implementation. > However, C++20 also brought dozens of smaller language and library > improvements that have been working just fine in both Clang and GCC even Yes, many library features C++20 brought are nice gems. :) > Ok, building and possibly also *testing* ;-) Tests for async things are usually not that good/exhaustive even for normal code that doesn't deal with experimental compiler features. If we go for coroutines, I'd just advise a slower and well-planned adoption then - use it in a smaller, but often used part, and then go from there. (I hate advocating slow adoption of something this cool, but... :) ) Cheers, Ivan -- dr Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org, https://cukic.co/ gpg key fingerprint: 8FE4 D32F 7061 EA9C 8232 07AE 01C6 CE2B FF04 1C12
