The main reason why on Zenned <https://zenned.gitlab.io/> I haven't yet set Wayland as the default session is the following bug <https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499256>.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 4:41 PM Alberto Salvia Novella < [email protected]> wrote: > My feeling is that the schedule shall not be based on a timeline, but > rather on when the technology is truly stable. > > Let me make a list of what is lacking right now on Wayland, and I will > come back to you shortly. > > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 11:03 AM Martin Riethmayer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Am 15.12.25 um 10:39 schrieb Ben Cooksley: >> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 10:14 PM Martin Riethmayer <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > Hi Martin, >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> [...] >> >> > 6.7.6 2026-10-27 >> > 6.7.7 2027-01-26 >> > 6.7.8 2027-06-22 >> > >> > >> > This sort of implies that we will have functional CI for the entire way >> > through to 6.7.8, which is much easier said than done. >> >> Just for clarification: Nothing here is set in stone, it's based on my >> quick LO Calc sheet and the initial release date wrt to the 4-month >> cycle, only. I'm not saying that this is the "best" way to go or that >> this "should" be the schedule, it's only one option. >> >> I'm sort of aware of these CI issues (though not in detail, of course) >> which is why I wanted to kick off a discussion on that schedule "early". >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> >> - I have not taken into consideration any release schedules of >> >> distributions >> >> >> > >> > Given this is essentially planned to be an LTS release (given the >> > support out to mid-2027) that is quite relevant here I'd say. >> >> I see the argument for this. Are there any distro maintainers on this >> list, other than Rik Mills that could voice an opinion? Or is there a >> better place to ask for distribution wishes wrt the schedule? >> >> Best regards >> >> Martin >> >
