On Thursday 19 July 2012, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Thursday 19 July 2012 20:35:51 Marco Martin wrote: > > but the most important thing is that kf5 is kinda the last chance for big > > incompatime changes, at least for a long while. > > do we need a libplasma in KF 5.0? Would it be a huge issue to say libplasma > is split out of frameworks but not released as part of 5.0, but will enter > in 5.1 or 5.2. Or having a split-out libplasma API compatible might be a > quite nice thing in fact for 3rd-party applications using Plasma and don't > want to do heavy porting. Remember KF 5 should be easy to port to, right > ;-)
personally, would not be a problem and would give quite some room to breathe ;) anybody can think about technical problems about it that may be lurking? it may mean a release of the workspace that doesn't use completely frameworks, so both old kdelibs and the frameworks will have to be distributed for some time, may this be a problem? (but not avoidable probably) Cheers, Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel