On Friday 20 July 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote: > On Thursday 19 July 2012 21:18:50 Marco Martin wrote: > > anybody can think about technical problems about it that may be lurking? > > it may mean a release of the workspace that doesn't use completely > > frameworks, so both old kdelibs and the frameworks will have to be > > distributed for some time, may this be a problem? (but not avoidable > > probably) > > Uh... please don't eat me :) > > Do we really want to support qgv? it is a super big chunk of code we will > have to maintain for, waht gain? >
keep in mind the instant the qgv part is dropped 100% of the shells, all plasmoids, all bindings and a good chunk of 3rd party plasmoids needs to be ported (and i would be surprised if the qml1 plasmoids would work in a qml2 version without being touched) so dropping the qgv part even if really applealing from the developer pov (it would solve quite some problems) is not feasible, because it really means another 4.0 :/ it will probably take years, in which probably a qml2 shell will coexist without being released for the use by developers -- Marco Martin _______________________________________________ Plasma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
