-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127702/#review94747
-----------------------------------------------------------



I think we should start adding autotests to those classes we can actually test, 
like this one. Could you add a simple test, so that we can at least tell the 
next person to expand also the autotest?

- Sebastian Kügler


On April 21, 2016, 10:11 a.m., David Rosca wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127702/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 21, 2016, 10:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Repository: plasma-framework
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ConfigModel may contain ConfigCategory for both QML pages and KCM pages. The 
> source property will be empty for KCM pages.
> This fixes correctly returning empty source for KCM pages. Also return the 
> same value from get().
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/plasmaquick/configmodel.cpp 3f69073 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127702/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added qml config page to plasma-pa, KCM page now works fine.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Rosca
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel

Reply via email to