sharvey added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS
> bruns wrote in AuthDialog.cpp:349 > According to > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/polkit/docs/latest/polkit.8.html#polkit-rules > `description` is not optional, so the correct statement is "Missing" I was checking to see if this was still open, and would like to discuss "Missing". I considered "Missing" while I was originally coding this, but thought it sounded a little negative, like we weren't able to access the information. I realize that "Missing" is the official response per the FDO spec, could we settle on something like "Not Provided"? After all, it's not //our fault// the information is missing. Just an idea. REPOSITORY R121 Policykit (Polkit) KDE Agent REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D12498 To: sharvey, bruns, ngraham, davidedmundson Cc: davidedmundson, bruns, ngraham, plasma-devel, ragreen, Pitel, ZrenBot, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, mart
